While the CIA Continues Attempting to Wipe-out the Majority of the Sinhalese People, their Religion and their Buddhist Culture is Sallay Acting as Their Trusted Agent? – Part 1
By Jonathan Manz
The US, the Constitution, the PTA and Sallay
As the annual UN General Assembly summit begins, many Sri Lankans ask, “Is Sallay collaborating with the CIA to reducing the ‘Sinhalese people’ to a minority’ in their own country”.
In a 2009 interview, a few months prior to the annihilation of the LTTE terrorists, US ambassador Blake, had the gall to publicly pronounce that for decades it has been the US objective to reduce the ‘Sinhala Race’ to a minority in Sri Lanka.
The ‘Sinhala race’, as Blake pejoratively refers to the Sinhalese people, are identifiable by the solid faith that 80% of Sri Lanka’s population has in Buddhism, despite 500 years of desecration of Buddhism and Buddhist culture by the Christian invaders.
This Buddhist political voter-base has been the bane of the enemy which is eying to occupy Sri Lanka, pillage her resources and use the country’s strategic location to dominate the world.
Unfortunately for the enemy, the SL Constitution, her law and the unity of the 80% voter-base have protected the country from their designs.
Blake also said that the US were opposed to the annihilation of the LTTE terrorists and desired the existence of the terrorists, in some way, in Sri Lanka.
Why is Sallay’s loyalty to Sri Lanka being questioned by many Sri Lankans, in this context?
In 2002, the US objectives which the Americans had hoped to achieve with their so-called peace plan was foiled; in that plan the US attempted to hoist Eelam on Sri Lanka and militarily occupy the Island.
Sallay worked with Sri Lanka’s military intelligence at a time when that intelligence arm had acquired a reputation for dishing- out kisses by favour.
Young Sallay, on passing out, was handicapped by an uninspiring personality; he reportedly resorted to opportunism to achieve his ends.
Sallay soon settled into the intelligence branch, a non-combative arm of the SL Army; it was not long, before Sallay sidled up to the DMI to win his confidence and allegedly become a close confidant of his.
US ‘Peace Plan’ – How the US attempted to occupy Sri Lanka Militarily
In 2002, the Americans who had defecated Tamil terrorism on the island-nation, attempted to broker a political-deal, between the terrorists and the GOSL.
The plan had the tacit approval of the then US Deputy Secretary of State, Richard Armitage; it was artlessly presented to Sri Lanka by America’s international nark, Norway.
The US plan included a ‘ceasefire’ agreement between the LTTE –the banned proxy-terrorists of the Americans – and the sovereign state of Sri Lanka.
On the pretext of ‘monitoring’ the ceasefire, the US plan permitted the Americans to induct, on sovereign Sri Lankan territory, the American military and, troops from the NATO, the largest military alliance of the Americans.
The countries, besides the US, which were permitted to induct their military on sovereign Sri Lankan soil included Norway, Denmark and Iceland from the NATO and those from Sweden and Finland, two countries empathetic to NATO aspirations; unsurprisingly, these two countries joined the NATO a short time thereafter.
The US plan had a financial carrot for Sri Lanka to bite; dangling that carrot were Japan and the EU, two of America’s closest allies; the carrot was conditional to allowing Japan and the EU to put their respective military boots on-the-ground to ‘monitor’ the ceasefire; they were deceptively referred to as ‘co-chairs’.
US ‘Peace Plan’ – How the US attempted to create ‘Eelam’ within Sri Lanka
Furthermore, in that plan, the US had the nerve to carve out, from the sovereign State of Sri Lanka, an independent State for their proxy-terrorists; the area demarcated, included the Northern and Eastern provinces of the island.
The area demarcated by the US for the terrorists was coincidently the same as that which was being projected by the terrorists as ‘Eelam’.
Ranil, had no qualms whatsoever to unilaterally give the government-nod to implement the treacherous American plan.
Speaking in parliament on 22 Jan 2002, Ranil is on record:
“The main issue for the commencement of talks with the LTTE is the international and local ban on the LTTE. The LTTE has stated that if it were to come for talks, the ban imposed on the organization locally should be lifted. On the other hand, international opinion stresses on the need to commence talks towards achieving a political solution… We have no right to play around [with] this last chance we have to achieve peace in Sri Lanka; We also have no right to indulge in narrow political aims making use of the ban on the LTTE… We are not prepared to let go of this last chance for peace. Deep thought is necessary on the local ban of the LTTE in view of this backdrop.”
Amendment 6 of the Sri Lankan Constitution makes a dick of Ranil and his notions of ‘self-government’ to the terrorists. It was out-and-out unconstitutional.
To make it appear seemingly constitutional, the faithful acolyte – one of America’s reliable lickspittle-triplets in Sri Lanka as assessed by former US ambassador Ashley Wills – bent over backwards, naively describing the proposed terrorist State as ‘interim’.
The PTA, by 1998, was a part of the normal law of the land; the PTA makes it illegal for the GOSL to deal with terrorists.
Ranil however ran headlong against the constitution of Sri Lanka and, Sri Lanka’s law, to implement the US plan.
The so called ‘peace-plan’ was the prototype of the US design on Sri Lanka and revealed clearly why America had created this terrorist group, liberally funded this terrorist organisation, urged Sri Lanka to negotiate with terrorists and, attempted to brainwash Sri Lanka to think that the terrorists were invincible.
The US ‘peace-plan’ was the forerunner to the creation of a sovereign State of Eelam within Sri Lanka and the occupation of Sri Lanka by US forces.
MR and SF smash American forces and dreams to smithereens
As history would have it, the traitorous American plan was smashed to smithereens at Nandikadal by Sri Lanka’s brilliant apical – political and military – leadership and, the resilience and unbending courage of the Sri Lankan people.
The Constitution and the PTA proved to be major stumbling blocks for the Americans.
By happenstance, a massive campaign, to replace Sri Lanka’s current Constitution and, to annul or amend the PTA has surfaced.
NGOs, INGOs and terrorist Eelamist-lobbies in the Western countries are working themselves to the bone, to achieve this.
There is no prize for guessing the country behind the campaign, and the funding; setting up Eelam and occupying the Island, militarily, is the end-name of the game.
The faithful acolyte, continues to play his lickspittle role; he is rooting for a new Constitution and the annulment of the PTA.
However, the acolyte remains strangely silent on the US Patriot Act that was legislated to fight terrorism in the USA; it remains, to date, a part of US law; the US Patriot Act makes Sri Lanka’s PTA pale in comparison.
Why must the acolyte make comment on the US Patriot Act?
Some may ask, ‘Why should the acolyte make any comment at all’?
The acolyte must, because Sri Lanka demands an explanation as to who gave the Butcher of Batalanda, in 2002, the authority to commit the Sri Lankan people to be partners and accessories to the heinous CIA crimes by assisting terrorist-suspects to be transported to secret ‘blackhole’ detention sites around the world, including US naval ships, where they are tortured, indefinitely held incommunicado and, hundreds murdered, without any trial.
The Butcher of Sri Lanka unilaterally volunteered and invited the CIA to use the international airport in Katunayake, and its facilities, to transfer terrorist suspects from one international jurisdiction to another; the act of transferring is described as ‘extraordinary rendition’.
Ranil and the CIA’s crimes of extraordinary rendition
‘Extraordinary rendition’, as has been described, is a euphemism for state-sponsored abduction (or kidnapping) in a foreign jurisdiction and transferring the abducted person to a third state; the Americans use this mechanism to circumvent America’s laws on interrogation, detention, extradition and/or torture.
Dick Cheyney justified America’s sordid conduct when he said “A lot of what needs to be done will have to be done quietly, using sources and methods available to our intelligence agencies, if we are going to be successful; it is vital for us to use any means at our disposal to achieve our objectives”.
Sri Lanka is one, of just 54 nations in the world which shamefully volunteered to abet the CIA in these murderous, illegal and inhumane acts of State terror.
Sri Lankans are glad to note that increasingly, the countries and persons involved in partnering the CIA in crimes of ‘extraordinary rendition’ are being criminally prosecuted.
In Italy, the country’s highest court upheld the convictions of US and Italian officials for their role in the extraordinary rendition of Abu Omar to Egypt.
In a similar case, the Canadian government was ordered to pay compensation of USD 10.5 million to Maher Arur, a Syrian born Canadian citizen.
A widely held view in Sri Lanka is that the Butcher of Batalanda should be criminally prosecuted and held personally accountable for dragging all Sri Lankans to a pariah status by abetting the CIA in crimes of ‘extraordinary rendition’.
In 2004 the CIA creates a break-away group from the LTTE and Sallay’s role in the process
It is ironic that Prabhakaran did not agree to the American plan; he insisted that the proscription of the LTTE as a terrorist organisation, must be lifted, if the LTTE were to meaningfully participate in talks with the GOSL.
The Americans were plainly disturbed. Prabhakaran’s decision could jeopardise US interests in Sri Lanka and the region; furthermore, it dented US control over their Eelam terrorists.
Washington decided to bring Prabhakaran to heel, clipping his wings and taking the Eastern Province out of Prabhakaran’s control.
To this end, the US decided to create a new Eelam movement in the East, which would be independent of the LTTE; in such a scenario, the Americans believed that they would have two, seemingly unconnected, Eelam movements in the country, giving the US greater manoeuvrability and flexibility to achieve its objectives in Sri Lanka and regain control over their proxy-terrorists.
Two US ambassadors, Lunstead and Blake, stressed that the LTTE were indispensable to US interests; they confirmed, without ambiguity, that the US had no intention, whatsoever, of annihilating the LTTE; they insisted that the GOSL must negotiate with the terrorists, despite the LTTE being officially declared terrorists in the US.
To create another terrorist movement in the East, independent of the LTTE and, beholden to the US, the Americans sounded UNP MP for Batticaloa – Seyed Ali Zahir Moulana – to speak with Karuna, the LTTE leader in the East; Seyed Moulana was educated in the US and a childhood friend of Karuna.
The US would establish a new Eelam terrorist group, the ‘Thamil Makkal Viduthalaip Puligal’ (TMVP).
Karuna would break-away from the LTTE and lead this new terrorist organisation in the East. Karuna would be required to accept the US plan for Sri Lanka put forward by the Norwegians.
Enticed by lucre, Karuna broke-away from Prabhakaran on 03 Mar 2004.
Sallay was the point-man coordinating the nitty- gritty with the CIA and the break-away group.
In part 2 of this article, it will be revealed how Sallay acted solely on the orders of the CIA and withheld this information from the GOSL.
References:
a. https://sangam.org/ANALYSIS/
c. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
d. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
f. https://www.tilaksblog.com/
g. https://www.tilaksblog.com/
h. https://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?
i. https://www.colombotelegraph.
j. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
l. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
m. https://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?
8 Viewers
