The traitors

In the fifties the UNP was called Unge Nedeyange Pakshaya (The party of their relatives). J R Jayewardene in the seventies did not change it but replaced the Senanayake – Kotelawala family with Jayewardene – Wickremesinghe – Wijewardhane family. However, political families are common in South Asia, especially in what is known as the subcontinent, and it is not my intention to criticize the UNP on this count. After all, even in the LSSP one finds leadership being passed from uncle to nephew. The UNP is the Unwilling National Party or the United Nation Party, indicating that it is the party of the fake international consisting of Western European and Northern American countries. The anti national position of the UNP was further revealed at the debate on the motion that effectively said that the Navi Pillai committee of paid coolies should not be allowed to step into the country for what is called a comprehensive investigation into what happened during the humanitarian operations.

The UNHRC committee appointed by Navi Pillai is very vague and it mentions of violation of human rights by both sides without defining a specific period and the two sides involved. It is the accuser who has appointed some of the “investigators” leaving room for the others to be appointed in due course.

The TNA as expected voted against the resolution exposing themselves again as the party of the dispersed Tamils used by the Western Christian countries against the country and the Sinhala people. The TNA is engaged in treason having conspired with foreign states and Tamil Nadu against the national policies of the Sri Lankan government.

LLRC report 

The policies of the party in power are the current policies of the state, and if the SLFP led government has decided not to devolve power according to the thirteenth amendment, not to implement the LLRC report, a report by a committee and not by the government, in full, no political party operating in Sri Lanka should discuss with India, England or an Indian state such as Tamil Nadu, and act in unison with them to change the policies of the state. It amounts to treason and Sampanthan is only a present day Mugalan as we have described in a previous article. A political party can always campaign against the policies of the state but such action should be within the boundaries of the country.

The TNA has done everything to change the policies of the state going to the extent of being proxy to the terrorist LTTE, which had the support of the Western countries and India, and if they have failed they should accept defeat without conspiring against the state. However, Tamil racism is kept alive by the Western countries and Tamil Nadu, and TNA would have died a natural death if not for these powers.

The Navi Pillai Committee that has been appointed is against the sovereignty of the country, and all the political parties should have voted unconditionally for the resolution by the nine MPs, if they were not traitors. It is true that the government had already decided not to allow the Pillai committee to come to Sri Lanka, but since it is a problem involving the sovereignty of the country a referendum should have been held to decide on the issue. Since probably it is not the time to hold a referendum, the government appears to have referred the matter to the Parliament.

Western Christian countries 

The TNA has never being patriotic, and no wonder that they voted against the resolution. The UNP on the other hand abstained showing clearly that the letters UNP do not stand for the United National Party but for either Unwilling National Party or the United Nations Party. The UNP has no moral right to talk on what happened during the humanitarian operations having ridiculed the armed forces by claiming that Thoppigala is only a jungle, the armed forces went to Medawachchi claiming that they went Kilinochchi, and any fool (the word used was gonek in Sinhala) can engage in war.

The UNP that signed the so called ceasefire agreement with the LTTE would have been happy if the LTTE was given what the latter wanted at the insistence of the Western Christian countries led by England. The UNP by the “ceasefire agreement” betrayed the armed forces, but now claims that it is the present government that has betrayed the armed forces. Unlike the UNP the present government did not supply arms to the LTTE nor did they ask the police or the armed forces to surrender to the LTTE. The Premadasa faction is not second to Ranil faction in betraying the forces and what is the betrayal by the present government that the UNP is talking about?

The report of the committee appointed by Navi Pillai has been already drafted as we know from past experience, and it is futile to expect an unbiased investigation from it. The UNHRC wants to punish the present government for defeating the LTTE that was used by the Western Christian countries to act against the Sinhalas, especially the Sinhala Buddhists.

The West is expecting an Arab Spring in Sri Lanka and for that purpose uses the UNP, which is its traditional agent, the JVP, the SLMC and of course the TNA the party of the dispersed Tamils. This talk of acting against the minorities by the Sri Lankan government is nothing but rubbish, as it is the interests of the Sinhala people the government has been unable to look after. It is not that the government is anti Sinhala or anti Sinhala Buddhist, but the moment the government acts in the interests of the Sinhala people there would be a hue and cry by the Western Christian countries against the government for working against the minorities.

Almost all the countries in the world are multi-cultural, but in each country there is a significant, prominent or dominant culture that is recognized by the citizens of the country. In the West it is the Judaic Christian culture, which is the hegemonic culture surpassing even the dominant state. The Judaic Christian culture is the hegemonic culture of the world as well, as could be seen from the education that the citizens all over the world receive.

The West attempts to control even the cultural policy of the world not satisfied being the hegemonic force in economics and politics. If there is a threat to the hegemonic Judaic Christian culture in any one of the Western Christian countries by another culture in the country, the state in the form of the government would intervene and take suitable action. However in the other countries, especially in the Theravada Buddhist countries the respective governments would be debarred from taking action with an appeal to the so called human rights of the other communities. When the governments are made inactive that way the people are forced to take law into their hands.

The world media controlled by the Western Judaic Christian culture will very often tarnish the image of the significant or the prominent culture of the country with blatant lies. Sri Lanka has an Article in the constitution, which could be found in the Sinhala English Pact of 1815 as well, to protect and promote Buddhism in the country. However, the western countries together with their agents in Sri Lanka would make sure that the article is never implemented. In Sri Lanka when the Catholic Church tells the Catholics to vote only for the Catholic candidates it is not considered as religious discrimination as the West is with the Catholic Church. If the Mahanayaka Theras wanted the Buddhists to vote only for the Buddhist candidates what would have the American ambassador done?

The committee appointed by Navi Pillai is in essence to punish the government and hence the state and the Sinhala people and their culture. It is against the sovereignty of the country and any party that did not vote for the resolution on Wednesday has acted against the sovereignty of the country. This includes the UNP that abstained from voting, and the JVP and the SLMC parties not present in the House at the time of voting.

Arab Spring

The JVP in spite of its rhetoric against the colonialists is an agent of the Western Judaic Christian dominant culture, and it is attempting to create trouble in the country thinking of some kind of Spring along the lines of Arab Spring. The JVP wants to go beyond Navi Pillai and include Rathupaswela, Aluthkade, and other failed springs also in the non specified “charge sheet”. The SLMC led by Hakeem threatens to go to the international arena as if he has not done it already. It is well known that Hakeem had sent a list of charges to Geneva in March.

The claim by the UNP, the United Nation Party, that the committee appointed by Navi Pillai is against the government and not against the country or the state is ludicrous to say the least. As we have said already the current state policy is the policy of the existing government and any foreign organization working against the government policy is plotting against the state policy. In any event what does the UNHRC expect from the committee appointed by Navi Pillai? Let us assume for the sake of argument that the committee has been appointed to probe into the “misdeeds” of the government.

It is known that from past experience that whether the government takes part or not in the investigation, the report will be against the government. The next step in the process would be to initiate action to impose economic and other sanctions and take other punitive measures to punish the government, which will in effect punish the people thus instigating them to rise against the government. It is the final Sri Lankan Spring that the West expects, and if they succeed the present government would be replaced by a UNP government. Once the President is removed from office he could be subjected to an inquiry by an “international jury” and this is what is meant by sending him to the guillotine.

Ranil Wickremesinghe, the anti nationalist who can never come to power through elections is trying to topple the government with the connivance of the UN. The West wants to change the policies of the state by making Ranil Wickremesinghe the UN sponsored president of the country, and he would be another Don Juan Dharmapala. If this so called action against the government elected by the people is not an action against the people and the state by the Western Christian colonialism then what is it?

By Nalin Silva

(Courtesy of Ceylon Daily News)

1210 Viewers